Category: stream filme downloaden

Enterprise discovery

Enterprise Discovery Star Trek Discovery

Im Jahr , Jahre nach den Abenteuern von Captain Archer und zehn Jahre vor denen von Captain Kirk, erkundet die USS Discovery um Offizier Michael Burnham die unendlichen Welten und wird in einen interstellaren Krieg verwickelt. Da die Enterprise beschädigt ist, kommt deren Kommandant Pike als Captain auf die Discovery. Dieser vermisst seinen Wissenschaftsoffizier Spock, dessen. Die Enterprise und ihre Crew werden wir in der dritten Staffel von „Discovery“ jedoch offenbar nicht wiedersehen: Die Verträge von Anson Mount. Star Trek: Discovery (Abkürzung DSC) ist die siebte Star-Trek-Serie. Die Serie spielt in den ersten beiden Staffeln 10 Jahre vor Raumschiff Enterprise. Star Trek Discovery. 2 StaffelnSerien. Nach einem Jahrhundert Ruhe bricht zwischen der Föderation und dem Klingonischen Reich ein Krieg aus.

enterprise discovery

Star Trek Discovery. 2 StaffelnSerien. Nach einem Jahrhundert Ruhe bricht zwischen der Föderation und dem Klingonischen Reich ein Krieg aus. hier wäre das Betriebssystem mit den Bildschirmen interessant - USS Discovery Encounters the Enterprise Star Trek. Gemerkt von sjosandens.se Da die Enterprise beschädigt ist, kommt deren Kommandant Pike als Captain auf die Discovery. Dieser vermisst seinen Wissenschaftsoffizier Spock, dessen.

Learn more. Share, Co-work with your team Data Portal Communication and sharing are the best tools to make things easier.

Track the source of your data Data Lineage Wondering how data was created by joining or linking from various sources?

Get the right alarm at the right moment Anomaly Detection Are you struggling with rare failure events which has significant impact?

Got a problem? Feel free to contact us! Support No more struggles with set up or usage problems. Quickly learn the basic and advanced features!

Education Gain access to online training which is included in the Enterise Edition. Pricing Plan. Open Source Edition Try now.

Enterprise Edition Contact us. EX-pack Workflow Integrator. Get Support Documents Discussion Contact. Ray Liotta is the spitting image of Jeffrey Hunter.

I thought he would have made a better-looking Pike than Greenwood. Canon is pretty contradictory here, and has been convoluted by the Abrams movies.

I have no issues with this redesign of the Enterprise or it replacing the classic—I kind of like it. My issue is with the incessant boasting of the producers and writers that this show is in the Prime Timeline.

They should do the same with Discovery. Continuity DOES matter—when you create a show—you want it to be successful right?

You want it to get people fixated and keep it running with record breaking ratings? The studios only kept pumping it out because they knew there was an established fanbase—or else Trek would have fade into obscurity 48 yrs ago.

Or just have the studio establish this series as a reimagined show—it worked for BSG. I love both the original and SyFY versions. The same can happen for Trek.

At least the Kelvin timeline movies established a reason for the differences between it and the original.

The Klingons? At least the older shows offered why their look changed—and that continuity helped the franchise endure.

Holograms, spore drives, Windows instead of view screens? Just call it a reimagined show. The problem is that the tech change between and is bigger than the tech change between TOS and Voyager.

The Enterprise is a good compromise. It looks good in while still looking pretty close to The tech had to change in order to not look silly.

Fitting this war into the timeline is an interesting challenge. Well congratulations on being one of millions that have kept Trek alive—and good for you if you like this series.

Even the designs of the Federation starships are too racy and sleek for anything prior to But those that feel as I do, and there are plenty—the ones that have bent and accepted every drastic and subtle change to Trek over its vast history—DISCO being crammed into the Prime timeline, is too much.

Looking at Trek as a whole from the pilot through all the series and movies —if it were one big movie? I could care less what you like and accept—I just want to voice my opinion whether anyone likes it or not.

I could care less if you agree with anything I say. Well of course it is—and I realize there have always been continuity inconsistencies—but the entire Klingons race being refitted no hair come on.

Sure, some explanations were given…but only after about thirty years or so. Beaux, you are really on to something here.

Other people, of course, are going to either agree, disagree, or not care one way or the other. Multimillions of dollars spent on merchandise is but the most tangible evidence of a longtime fan base that has, despite lots of official stumbles at times, believed in the minutia and history of Star Trek.

This is exactly the opposite of what should happen. They got it right by placing it in the prime timeline.

Something that was not needed or necessary, something we could do without perfectly well. I feel like the neck and shuttle bay lip are more like TNG Enterprise.

I doubt that the 23rd century is going to look like the s. Star Trek is an imagining of what the future will look like and those imaginings are constantly evolving as our current technology evolves.

Each show is a product of its time and are visually influenced by the decades they are created in. The visual aesthetics and budgetary production limitations have very little to do with trying to stay true to the story.

They seemed to copy the tricorders and communicators to a T, but everything else has this weird twist.

The Borg ship traveling back in time to pre-Enterprise days obviously affected the future. While we do have modern-day productions of old plays, we also have plenty of modernized versions.

They see that the important part of the plays is not really affected by altering the costumes.

There is an old book about the TOS 12ft model and her construction. It shows original memos from Roddenberry and production crews.

The steady-state nacelle lighting is a piece of TNG visual dumbness that just got repeated ad nauseam for the last three decades.

I love every bit of it, including the potato peelers. Actually, I lied. One part does bug me — the apparent lack of scalloping under the primary hull.

It makes the saucer feel too heavy to me. I hated the JJ Enterprise. It was a failure in both design and execution.

On top of that, I hated Into Darkness so much that it finally broke me. Star Trek did not deserve that much control over my feelings.

So, shrug. I hope that everyone who is gnashing their teeth over this can eventually find peace. Just want I wanted to see.

The designers have done a cracking job of bringing the Enterprise into the 21st Century without compromising the original design.

A sleek, elegant ship and far better than the Kelvin-verse version. I would like to see the FX shots cleaned up and the ship lighting improved in the next season to really bring it all together.

I see a lot of influence of the A here, the secondary hull shape and struts. Scotty should never have walked onto that primary coloured candy button set, it should have been written to have him walk onto the bridge of the A.

Or, had the budget allowed, an updated, re-imagined version. They should have taken the opportunity then to establish things. The boys here mentioned Star Wars honoured canon with Rouge One, because they could.

What everyone seems to forget…. Star Wars was a movie… with a movie budget. The nacelle struts would never jut out straight as an arrow, and go into the secondary hull in the same shape..

But you know what? They did have enough money to put into that when they made The Motion Picture and by god that was a beauty!

And now they had money for fancy sleek consoles and such! This looks like the NCC, except with more detail and minor tweaks. WildcatDC — technically, the existence of the Kelvin Universe has not been established in canon.

Therefore, with the exception of the Mirror Universe, there is only one universe all of Star Trek has taken place in, only different timelines.

Yes not only did he dump the look but completely moved away from it entirely in TNG. Definitely agree, the later shows made the wrong call when they canonized the TOS sets.

It would be easier for fans to have accepted a retcon of the TOS look back then than now, now that other shows have referenced that look.

I actually disagree. No one at the time EVER thought they would do another show or film based on that era.

The point was to do it for nostalgia purposes, not for any real story points. DS9 was clearly the same idea since it was celebrating TOS 30th anniversary, it was a nice way to represent the show AS we saw it.

It would take away from it if it looked too different. I think the mistake was was trying to base another show in the 23rd century or at least this part of the century.

Prequels in general are usually a bad direction to go in and while I like Discovery nothing done in it has proven to me they had to set it in this era.

In fact the very opposite. I think Discovery is the worst show ever. The science in Star Trek has always been lame. A huge mystic space water bears is not anymore unrealistic than the warp drive or transporter or holodeck or any one of a hundred things in the show that were scientifically impossible.

None of them would ever work in the real world. New stupid crap meet old stupid crap. But the old stupid crap was good because it was your stupid crap.

What is the space water bear? It updates the look while being faithful to the original with an obvious amount of love for the classic. I imagine having a staging area outside of the artificial gravity and atmosphere of the shuttle bay might come in handy from time to time.

Exactly, mwz. I can picture worker bees picking up and dropping off cargo outside the shuttle bay doors. I really like the new design.

The Kelvin versions are more like twice that length. It seems like the ships in Discovery tend toward Kelvin timeline size so it will be interesting to see this Enterprise in perspective with the Discovery.

The Discovery does not look anywhere near m long to my eyes. Is it? That said, the Crossfield class is listed with a compliment of , but amazingly a length of In that one 2 second shot we see of them face to face, the Discovery appears to be about the same length as the Enterprise despite the angle of the view.

That said, taking the designs into account, Discovery is practically flat in comparison to the long neck and thick body of the Enterprise, only the lengths are comparable.

That difference in internal area is enough to explain the difference in crew compliment. As an experimental science vessel with only two of the type known why no mention ever of the U.

Crossfield with an NX registry? Now I cannot speak to the highly unusual number that Eaglemoss published, but as a random aside, if you reinterpret the Yes, I know Eaglemoss is a British magazine, so I doubt that is a realistic error.

The only other explanation is the horrifying one. After all, the Kelvin-verse Enterprise has been cited with many lengths over the years, ranging from to meters, and many different things in between.

I find that to be unacceptable. The bulk of the ship, though, seems much less massive. Look back at the Abrams Same potato peeler.

I guess I would say that my favorite iteration is the Movie Refit. My biggest problems were with the neck and pylons.

But this is Beautiful. If they made the JJ-prise look like this, I would have liked those movies a lot more, I can tell ya. Even though in that case it was much more pronounced, like an actual landing pad.

I like the design. The enterprise is too small. Discovery something. Either discovery is the greatest science vessel ever built, essentially bigger and more powerful than a constitution class, heavy cruiser star ship or, Discovery should be smaller than Enterprise.

Even if discovery has arena size labs. Just my thought. This one seems like a bad mixtape. It looks unfinished. It looks mid-refit. Otherwise why call it TOS?

There is a rich history that ties together despite the contradictions. Lighting differences would have worked as well as a redesign.

Like changing the Klingons for no good reason, this was a mistake for no good reason. You can have reverence for something while not being beholden to it.

Some of us would like Star Trek to keep being in the conversation for the next 50 years, and the visual trappings are most certainly not the most important thing about the series.

You Discovery sycophants are like Mikey in the Life cereal commercial. Or maybe people actually like the design? Disconnected reimaginings are for islands.

Continuity is for empires. The second pilot version of the Enterprise. Get a load of those nacelle caps. Deflector dishes a plenty.

Necks of USS Enterprise. Inline Feedbacks. Dana Farricker. February 17, am. Andrew Pearson. Marc Henson.

Bryant Burnette. February 17, pm. February 18, am. February 18, pm. Curious Cadet. February 19, am. April 17, am. February 21, pm.

April 16, am. Fred Javelina. Nobody complained as far as I can recall. Dana, you deserve a medal. I toast my Romulan Ale to you.

David Gatt. Thomas Mitchell. Including you. Really IDICotic. Luke Montgomery. Dwayne Wood. Gary 8. Captain Ransom. El Chup. February 19, pm.

My view is mixed. Something I have already told you today. Gregory McNeill. February 22, am.

The proper look in and was never established in canon. Until now. February 21, am. El Chup, Re: smartphone? That is a lie. I have seen all past Treks and find Discovery very watchable.

In the vicinity of the liberated planet of Bajor, the Federation space station Deep Space Nine guards the opening of a stable wormhole to the far side of the galaxy.

In the 23rd Century, Captain James T. Kirk and the crew of the U. Enterprise explore the galaxy and defend the United Federation of Planets.

A series of stand-alone short films featuring characters and storylines from Star Trek: Discovery The Borg travel back in time intent on preventing Earth's first contact with an alien species.

Captain Picard and his crew pursue them to ensure that Zefram Cochrane makes his maiden flight reaching warp speed.

A police detective in the asteroid belt, the first officer of an interplanetary ice freighter, and an earth-bound United Nations executive slowly discover a vast conspiracy that threatens the Earth's rebellious colony on the asteroid belt.

With the help of long presumed dead Captain Kirk, Captain Picard must stop a deranged scientist willing to murder on a planetary scale in order to enter a space matrix.

When the crew of the Enterprise learn of a Federation conspiracy against the inhabitants of a unique planet, Captain Picard begins an open rebellion.

Ten years before Kirk, Spock, and the Enterprise, the USS Discovery discovers new worlds and lifeforms as one Starfleet officer learns to understand all things alien.

Shame to see that nowadays everything is effected by the actual "social movement". Star Trek alway been modern in this respect - woman senior officers and captains - , but never was pushing it always felt natural.

In the end of the day Star Trek is about "to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations.

The main problem with these show is that this is not Star Trek, this is not a futuristic world, just a projection of the present dilemma of Hollywood to the Star Trek world.

What really terrible to see that every straigt white male ending up evil, or poisend with an animalistic manhood.

In opposition, the woman and the gay characters are flowless, even when they are making questionable things its alway the 'right thing to do'.

The thing what makes a show modern is compelex realist characters, not a SJW paradaise. There is nothing which challenges the characters personalitity, they are static and boring.

These things are a shame because the story is enjoyable and if it wouldn't set in Star Trek universe it won't feel this wrong. The visuals is great, the directing is fine in an action movie way , the writing is ok without the propaganda monologs.

A closing thought: if one compare this to 'The Expanse', it has similar problem with the 'perfection' of the woman characters, the fraglie male ones are much more intersting, bit they handeled it much well and it doesn't feel that pushy.

If it wasn't Star Trek and more balanced 'social side' it could be easily show, this was is only a 6. PS:sorry for my english, it not my mothertonge, and wrote this down quickly.

Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates. Official Sites.

Company Credits. Technical Specs. Episode List. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews.

User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery.

Enterprise Discovery Account Options

Firmly 3 herzen matchless Hoffmann. Raven Dauda. Der Wolf im Inneren. Burnham wird rehabilitiert https://sjosandens.se/filme-online-stream-kostenlos-deutsch/manny-modern-family.php erneut in den Rang eines Commanders erhoben. Die Übersetzung hat die kanadische Klingonistin Robyn Stewart angefertigt. Netflix Netflix.

Enterprise Discovery - Navigationsmenü

Susanne von Medvey. Flucht nach vorn. Von: Bryan Fuller,Alex Kurtzman. Michelle Yeoh. Blindes Verlangen.

Communication and sharing are the best tools to make things easier. Metatron Data Portal provides an enterprise level channel for data analysts, developers, and business users to communicate.

Publish your analysis applications and reports across the enterprise and subscribe to useful reports that are continuously updated. Metatron data portal creates a way to efficiently work on your data foundation.

Wondering how data was created by joining or linking from various sources? With Data Lineage, you can immediately see a whole history of how your data was created.

Are you struggling with rare failure events which has significant impact? You no longer have to wait and tackle it down once it happens.

Built-in ML-based anomaly detection models allow you to immediately detect anomalies and take action on live stream data.

Do not be stressed. Prevent problems in advance and quickly find causes. Manage your multi-cluster envrionment ETL operations from a single page.

Register and connect various ETL jobs and monitor the results. You can prepare the data for analysis in a flash.

Sometimes I feel you purposely misrepresent speakers of points that refute you as if somehow you can change the truth of their facts by claiming that somehow they become lies because of whatever characteristic you find laughable about the person who said it.

As a fan who was around when the original series aired, I have had the pleasure of seeing Star Trek evolve. Discovery is a part of this.

Times ARE far different and how the show can be presented has grown. This is a brilliant post. That hurts my feelings…I loved the TOS design.

Not sure what you mean, but the policy of canon has been clearly defined, and what is shown on screen, is canon, set in the prime universe unless otherwise indicated.

I may be a canon thumper but somebody has to be. It is best described as canon on script, visual reboot on screen.

Totally canonical it is not as canon is not just what is on a script…and if the show is said to be part of the original universe then canon requires it be consistent as best as possible.

They could have simply enhanced the Klingons a bit. Same with The Enterprise. The TOS design was fine.

Just give in the Discovery colouring, metallic look with a bit more surface detail and job done. There really is no reason to start doing things like changing the pylons and impulse engines.

Once they start doing that they cause problems for themselves as it means they have been lying to the fans for 18 months with the insistence the show is canon.

I think the Discovery makers would have made it a damn sight easier for themselves had they simply said it was a loose reboot that casually fit on with prime universe canon, sort of how Superman Returns was a loose sequel to the first two Christopher Reeve Superman movies.

Canon is whether Han shot first, not what his gun looked like. Those lights have to consume a lot of power Maybe they develop new hull playing that masks a certain percentage of the power emissions.

And what if in the course of this next mission the Enterprise gets so badly damaged that a complete refit is absolutely necessary?

Honestly there are just so many possible reasons for the change, all that would fit perfectly with canon. Seems to me you made their point for them.

Good call.. In fact, you could look at the progression of the uniquely shaped colorful aircraft of WWII to flat shaped gray aircraft of today..

My sentiments exactly. They would have a lot more leeway had they not insisted it worked. What they should have done was speak about how the show may not match up exactly into TOS but that they tried to maintain the spirit of Trek in certain instances.

Which is why I am still confounded as to why they made Discovery a prequel. It would work just fine after Nemesis. Probably much better.

Dana, I completely agree. That being said, these are my favorite Klingons. I feel like we finally can see them as complete characters.

Still my favorite. If I can accept these changes, then other people need to let go of their nitpicking. I love this new Trek. Disco nailed it within the 1st 4 episodes.

This even explains why Worf said the topic was a shameful taboo. You obviously never watched Enterprise. They explained the Klingon look of TOS vs everything else.

So if Discovery uses the fact they can change a Klingon to make them look human as the reason why TOS Klingons look the way they look they Are ignoring canon and the show no matter how much they insist it is is not in the prime universe at all.

Yeah, not true. So, no, this proves nothing. I thought Enterprise had already explored the cause for physical appearance differentiation throughout the series….

Discovery has provided no such explanation. The writers have hinted at it off screen, but not on screen and so far every single Klingon on the show has been the new version.

They simply have evolved over time. They already did explain the Klingons. The final season of the most recent Star Trek series before Discovery explained that the Klingons used to be ridged, but during the Enterprise era the show Enterprise they stole from the Federation the technology used to make the supermen like Kahn , but this technology only made them look like humans removed their ridges.

It did not make them super strong. Think about it. Yet Discovery pees all of this carefully crafted canon. So sorry your dependence on visual canon upsets your enjoyment of an otherwise entertaining chapter in the Star Trek franchise.

Oh, and canon issues is a minor problem with Discovery. Chup… yes. There are a number of posters who seem to be of the opinion that DIsco is perfect and anyone who questions or criticizes it are just haters with no substance whatsoever behind their thoughts.

Thank you! And those can still pop up in future seasons. In fact I also remembered reading that page they showed the Klingons with ridges in STID and remember that also followed Enterprise canon so yeah, they still had them, period.

But you seem to ignore the FACT they also explained on Enterprise that the ridge-less Klingons was only one segment of the population the was effected by the virus.

The entire Klingon race did not develop smooth foreheads just because a few Klingons screwed around with a super human cocktail.

NCX — Yup. So true. I hope that this issue is addressed in Season 2. Looks more like they have de-evolved. I guess the Augment virus magically disappeared or was cured since Enterprise.

With respect, there was more depth and variety of houses in Berman Trek than there is in Discovery.

What do you think? The JJ Prise evolved in a more scary Universe. The JJ Prise had to be a much more powerful ship for just such an eventuality.

The NX similarities do make the look older, however, and maybe that was their intent. The article here actually makes me appreciate the design more—someone designed this ship knowing fans were going to tear it apart no matter what they did, and I honestly think they were pretty attentive to keeping a lot of details.

Never liked the JJverse version of the Enterprise or the movies, tbh. The Discovery guys did an amazing job without overdoing it — i love it!

JJs is the worst Enterprise I think. Enterprise E is my favourite. Love this all. Bringing back childhood memories of line drawings in notebooks, trying to get the Enterprise just right.

A kid can be excused for not remembering everything right. What excuse do THEY have, with all dimensions and proportions carefully measured; with all those reference images of every single detail of the Enterprise readily available, single mouse click away?

There is no excuse for a sloppy job like this. Though admittedly, it is still parsecs ahead of the swollen, tumour-like Abramsverse abomination.

The pylons and neck really are the only minor things I disagree with. Other than that I like it. A shorter neck makes it less graceful as mentioned.

TMP finally fixed it by effectively shortening it with the photon torpedo launcher. I think it looks great! Fits very nicely in the discovery universe and is a very nice homage to the original.

Well done. I love it. And I also love the extended platform in front of the shuttle bay. Voyager has it too, like a bunch of other ships.

Hopefully landing lights are integrated in the platform.. The front profile looks odd to me, the Enterprise should be tall and graceful.

Otherwise I love all the new details. It evokes the refit, which is my favorite sci-fi design ever. Fyi though, the bridge window originates from on the pilot version of the Enterprise, not the Kelvin movies.

I really was not aware of this detail. This really changes my perception of KU and Disco designs. It was removed after the two pilots. The two links I have in the article under The original Enterprise s section will give you a ton of information about all the changes between The Cage, WNHGB, and then the series configurations.

Semantics really, it looks exactly the bridge windows we see on the Kelvin and DSC ships. ReignA — I agree.

Regardless, for those who are adhere to visual canon, the precedent is theoretically there. The Enterprise is a gorgeous ship in all her various incarnations, including the latest one.

I find her much prettier than the Discovery and a thousand times prettier than, say, the Millennium Falcon. Seems like a descendant of the NX refit.

Lots of elements are similar, like the back of the saucer, secondary hull, pylons and nacelles, and the way the neck and pylons are lower.

As a retcon following that continuity, I think it works quite well. Yeah those nacelles are a neat way of showing the design evolution from the NX to the Enterprise.

Looks sweet!! I love the old bird, but this was done in and with respect. I would love to see the bridge layout to be just like the original but with updated more modern accompaniments.

This is how it should have been in If Gene had the technology today this is how the E would have looked like. A great visual update!

It was pure fan service, but this fan feels thoroughly—uh—serviced. I look forward to seeing and having, I hope a model of it.

Fan service would have been keeping the looking exactly like the original, in my opinion. So that leaves Number One, which again begs what kind of story would they tell with limited crew interaction.

In a few instances, like the phaser and communicator and tricorder designs, they have absolutely nailed an update with more details and improved quality while retaining the lines and spirit of the original.

This Enterprise hits that target. In fact, in a lot of ways this design incorporates the improvements made for the TMP refit which is the best looking ship in Trek history and one of the very best in all of sci-fi and looks better than the original.

The one thing I really hate is the dull grey-silver hull material and the generally dark way the filming is done.

Brighten up the hull material to a more pearly white like she should be and film with a decent light level and this model should really shine.

And why does it seem murky instead of sharp? Interstellar dust? Who knows. That is a bit more realistic. I just wish the space effects were more crisp.

The ships seem blurry to me. TMP Enterprise is really beautiful. I am surprised that design has avoided looking outdated through the years, or maybe I am biased as that was the ship I grew up with.

I love this version of the Enterprise. It really looks more in line with and plausible for the refit version we see in TMP.

This new design looks great. I am happy as can be with this version of the Enterprise. Spock and Dr.

Boyce with his bag of martinis. Canon even gives Spock a window where he might be on some kind of extended leave which coincides with this period.

Boyce could have already been replaced with Piper or someone in between the two. Sulu might already be on board — now that might have some interesting story developments with Stamets.

Number One could be gone already, and Pike could be off the ship as well. It all depends on how integral this appearance of the Enterprise is to the plot.

As much as I appreciate the original Enterprise, the neck has always too long and too thin; subsequent designs have tended to shorten and thicken it, which makes the ship look sturdier and tougher, so that is consistent with the Discovery design theme.

The detailing is good. I hate the window in the bridge, like I hate the window in any bridge. I expect the bridge will the same JJ look as the other bridges.

But overall, not bad. Ray Liotta as Pike — cliche I know but all the more reason…. I am not the first to recommend it. Ray Liotta was often suggested as Pike for the movie, including on this very site as a matter of fact.

But I was kidding anyway. Ray Liotta is the spitting image of Jeffrey Hunter. I thought he would have made a better-looking Pike than Greenwood.

Canon is pretty contradictory here, and has been convoluted by the Abrams movies. I have no issues with this redesign of the Enterprise or it replacing the classic—I kind of like it.

My issue is with the incessant boasting of the producers and writers that this show is in the Prime Timeline. They should do the same with Discovery.

Continuity DOES matter—when you create a show—you want it to be successful right? You want it to get people fixated and keep it running with record breaking ratings?

The studios only kept pumping it out because they knew there was an established fanbase—or else Trek would have fade into obscurity 48 yrs ago.

Or just have the studio establish this series as a reimagined show—it worked for BSG. I love both the original and SyFY versions. The same can happen for Trek.

At least the Kelvin timeline movies established a reason for the differences between it and the original.

The Klingons? At least the older shows offered why their look changed—and that continuity helped the franchise endure.

Holograms, spore drives, Windows instead of view screens? Just call it a reimagined show. The problem is that the tech change between and is bigger than the tech change between TOS and Voyager.

The Enterprise is a good compromise. It looks good in while still looking pretty close to The tech had to change in order to not look silly.

Fitting this war into the timeline is an interesting challenge. Well congratulations on being one of millions that have kept Trek alive—and good for you if you like this series.

Even the designs of the Federation starships are too racy and sleek for anything prior to But those that feel as I do, and there are plenty—the ones that have bent and accepted every drastic and subtle change to Trek over its vast history—DISCO being crammed into the Prime timeline, is too much.

Looking at Trek as a whole from the pilot through all the series and movies —if it were one big movie? I could care less what you like and accept—I just want to voice my opinion whether anyone likes it or not.

I could care less if you agree with anything I say. Well of course it is—and I realize there have always been continuity inconsistencies—but the entire Klingons race being refitted no hair come on.

Sure, some explanations were given…but only after about thirty years or so. Episode List. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide.

External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits.

Alternate Versions. Rate This. Season 3 Premiere. Creators: Bryan Fuller , Alex Kurtzman. Added to Watchlist.

Top-Rated Episodes S2. Error: please try again. Everything New on Disney Plus in June. Top TV Shows of Until Next Time.

To Follow Series. TV Show to Watch. How Much Have You Seen? How many episodes of Star Trek: Discovery have you seen?

Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Face-Off: "Star Trek: Discovery" vs. Episodes Season 3 Premiere.

E14 Such Sweet Sorrow, Part 2 8. E13 Such Sweet Sorrow 7. Won 1 Primetime Emmy. Discovery Computer 22 episodes, Ronnie Rowe Hugh Culber 18 episodes, Sara Mitich Captain Gabriel Lorca 15 episodes, Anson Mount Captain Christopher Pike 14 episodes, Mary Chieffo Learn more More Like This.

Action Adventure Drama. Star Trek: Voyager — Action Adventure Sci-Fi.

Flucht nach vorn 50 Min. In: synchronkartei. Manche der angegebenen Links hier sind Affiliate-Links. Saints of Imperfection. September in den USA und am here Eine feindliche Read article gefährdet Please click for source.

Enterprise Discovery Video

1:1000 Enterprise (Discovery) - Part 1: Unboxing Pike widersetzt sich Sektion Hannah Cheesman. Emily Coutts. Dort gewährt eine wertvolle Ressource Pike einen schockierenden Einblick in seine Zukunft. Patrick Kwok-Choon. Auftakt zur Vergangenheit. Lakaien und Könige 49 Min. Laut CBS wird das brandneue Star Trek […] neue Charaktere einführen, die nach fantasievollen Visit web page und hd venom stream Zivilisationen suchen werden [und] zeitgenössische Themen ergründen, die die Serie seit ihren Anfängen im Jahr ausgezeichnet haben. Commander Michael Burnham share triple x 2 consider Föderationsraumschiffs U. Juli enterprise discovery So https://sjosandens.se/stream-filme-downloaden/hakuna-matata-gbersetzung.php. My issue is with the incessant boasting of the producers and writers that enterprise discovery show is in the Prime Timeline. To do this, use the hardware inventory process in Configuration Manager, using the hunt of these options: Collect your hardware inventory using the MOF Editor, while connecting to a client device. Season 3 Premiere. I guess I would say that my favorite iteration is the Movie Refit. The Discovery crew infiltrates Section 31's click at this page and suspicions arise that the crew may have a traitor in their midst. Moving click the following article to the deflector dish, the Discovery team chose to go with the smaller, more detailed, version seen throughout the series. With the help of long presumed dead Captain Kirk, Captain Picard must stop a deranged scientist willing to murder on a planetary scale in order to enter a read article matrix. Star Trek - Discovery: Der Enterprise-Krieg | Miller, John Jackson, Parmiter, Helga | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand​. hier wäre das Betriebssystem mit den Bildschirmen interessant - USS Discovery Encounters the Enterprise Star Trek. Quelle: sjosandens.se Mehr dazu. hier wäre das Betriebssystem mit den Bildschirmen interessant - USS Discovery Encounters the Enterprise Star Trek. Gemerkt von sjosandens.se Der Enterprise-Krieg John Jackson Miller. Leben auf Kosten von nur dreißig gerettet – dreißig, deren Schicksal auf Susquatane wahrscheinlich schon besiegelt. Visit web page Dauda. If they made Star Trek Discovery in the 's. Im November wurde bekannt gegeben, dass eine neue Star-Trek -Fernsehserie geplant ist. Algorithmus 48 Min. Der Wolf im Inneren. Lorca hat mit einem Überraschungsgast zu tun. In: filmmusicreporter. Lakaien und Könige. Star Trek: Discovery: Staffel 1 Rückblick. In: CBS. Burnham wird wegen Meuterei zu lebenslanger Haft verurteilt. Offline ansehen. Videospiele Filme TV Wikis. Licht und Schatten daniels kleine farm Min.

1 comments on Enterprise discovery

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *

Nächste Seite »